This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are used for visitor analysis, others are essential to making our site function properly and improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Click Accept to consent and dismiss this message or Deny to leave this website. Read our Privacy Statement for more.
Home   |   Contact Us   |   Sign In   |   Register
Article Library
Blog Home All Blogs

The Overlooked Diversity: Neurodiversity in the Workplace

Posted By USFN, Wednesday, April 27, 2022

By EmilyBartekoske, Esq.

SouthLaw,P.C. *

USFN Member (IA, KS, MO, NE)

 

            Most people, myself included, when asked to think about integrating topics of diversity, equity, and inclusion into our workplaces immediately go to a handful of areas: race, gender, physical disability, sexuality, and sexual orientation. In fact, until I was presented with the opportunity to write this article, I can say that I had never given much thought to applying diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts in the workplace to the way people think. That realization came as a surprise, considering that I am a neurodivergent person.

            So what does it mean to be neurodivergent? Neurodivergent is an umbrella term first coined in the 1980’s that embraces the natural range of variation in human brain function and processing.  Essentially, neurodivergent individuals think and process information differently than the average, or neurotypical, person. People are neurodivergent if they have certain developmental, intellectual, learning, or mental health disabilities. Examples of well-known neurodiverse conditions include autism spectrum disorders, dyslexia, dyspraxia, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).  Some other conditions that can sometimes cause people to be neurodivergent are Tourette syndrome, post-traumatic stress disorder, schizophrenia, and depression.

            While the vast majority of people in corporate America and in the legal profession are neurotypical, the percentages of neurodivergent employees have been increasing. In fact, a 2016 study from the Hazelden Betty Ford Clinic and American Bar Association found that 28% of lawyers suffer from depression, 19% suffer from anxiety, and 12.5% have ADHD.  Additionally, experts typically agree that the number of professionals who are neurodivergent is vastly underreported, as many professionals choose not to disclose their conditions due to fear of reprisal at work or fear of being seen as “weak” or “dumb.” Legally, the conditions that cause neurodivergence are considered disabilities, and thus, affected employees are protected under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

            While there are obviously many conditions that fall under the umbrella of neurodiversity, I want to focus mostly on ADHD, as is it one of the most common conditions that we are likely to see in our neurodiverse employees and coworkers. Furthermore, it’s one of the conditions I am most familiar with, having been diagnosed with ADHD in 2014.

            Let’s talk about what it means to be a neurodivergent person with ADHD in the workplace. First, we must dismiss the stereotype that all people with ADHD are hyper-active and disruptive. While that is one way for ADHD to present in people, there is a second way that ADHD can present which is best summed up as inattentiveness. This includes symptoms such as struggling to pay attention, difficulties with organization, forgetfulness, and being easily distracted. At the core of both presentations of ADHD are difficulties with executive function.

             Executive function is a term used to describe a group of skills that enable humans to plan, focus attention, remember, execute tasks, and multitask. While all of us struggle with these skills sometimes, people with ADHD struggle with these issues daily.  When a neurotypical person is given a newly assigned project at work, they typically will jump right in and get to work, moving fairly easily toward the final product. When a person with ADHD is given a new project, they will often feel paralyzed and unsure of where to begin. They struggle to conceptualize how long things will take, what steps are involved, what outcomes may happen, or how to even imagine what the final product will look like.  The overwhelming uncertainties can be debilitating and can make it impossible to even start the task at hand.  As a result, people with ADHD can be branded as lazy, procrastinators, and even incompetent.  Many professionals with ADHD try to hide their struggles and appear "normal" to avoid such labels, even though doing so creates internal stress, anxiety, and fears of their struggles being discovered.

What is important for both neurodivergent people and employers to understand is that in many ways, people who are neurodivergent actually can be some of the most valuable employees and assets a business can have. Studies have repeatedly shown that as a group, neurodivergent people tend to be diligent, loyal, detail-oriented, and creative problem solvers. The fact that they think differently than most other employees allows them to identify issues that typically go unnoticed. Some benefits that neurodivergent employees can bring to their careers are:

·        Attention to detail: Neurodiverse people excel at zeroing in on details that often go overlooked by others. This can mean finding additional information in documents that might otherwise be missed, or noticing patterns in data that were previously unnoticed.

·        Focus: Struggles to focus and avoid distractions are common for employees with ADHD. However, when someone with ADHD is working with a project or subject matter that interests them, they have the tendency to ‘hyperfocus.’ This can translate to them having a highly focused attention on what they’re doing for a long period of time without being distracted by other things happening around them.

·        Creativity: Studies consistently show that neurodivergent people are more creative on average than neurotypical people. When executive function is working at its best it is difficult to slow down, let thoughts wander freely, and really think about the process. Since neurodivergent people have lower executive function, they are more likely to engage in creative problem-solving and thinking outside of the box.

·        Work well under pressure: Neurodivergent people, especially those with ADHD, are used to completing tasks at the last minute because their executive function often doesn’t allow them to start a task until it absolutely has to be done. While this means that these employees won’t often be handing in projects early, it also means that when there is a crisis or a deadline that would make most people feel frantic, neurodivergent people often are calm and collected in those moments and have the ability to work quickly and efficiently.

With each of these benefits, there of course are potential downfalls. To avoid these, employers should be proactive about communicating with neurodivergent employees and providing accommodations to help these employees succeed. While there is no “one size fits all” when it comes to accommodations, implementing and allowing some simple, common things could make a big difference in the performance of neurodivergent employees. Some examples of accommodations include:

·        Flexible working arrangements: Sometimes an office setting is too distracting for neurodivergent people. Allowing employees to work from home or in their optimal environment will allow them to focus better on the work they are doing.

·        Sensory friendly environments: Many neurodivergent people also are prone to sensory overload. Things like background noise from HVAC systems or the brightness of fluorescent lighting can be very distracting. To accommodate this, employers should try to ensure workplaces are sensory friendly by using neutral colors, soft lighting, and ensuring regular maintenance of mechanical systems in the office.

·        Allowing use of headphones to minimize distractions.

·        Providing blocks of uninterrupted work time: Neurodivergent employees often have trouble getting back on track when they are interrupted in the middle of a task. Providing set times for work with no interruptions from coworkers or phone calls allows employees to work more efficiently.

·        Allow use of fidget devices: Using things such as fidget spinners, stress balls, or similar tools allow neurodivergent people to focus the hyperactive areas of their brains on the device so that the rest of their focus can be on their work.

While this list is far from exhaustive, it is a good place to start for employers who want to create a work environment that is welcoming and inclusive of its neurodivergent employees. In a society that is increasingly valuing diversity and a workforce that is increasingly valuing individuality, right now is the time for employers to be intentional about considering neurodiversity in their business plans and recruitment efforts.

 

@Copyright 2022

April e-Update

Tags:  #Diversity  #Equity  #Inclusion  #Neurodiversity  #USFN  ability  bias  disability  hiring  HR  retention 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Earning A Seat at the Table and Making Room for Others

Posted By USFN, Thursday, January 27, 2022

By Eva Massimino, Esq.

Bendett & McHugh, P.C.

USFN Member (CT, ME, MA, NH, RI, VT)

 

The Table --not just any table, the table. It’s the place from which all important decisions seem to flow. Where policy and strategy discussions are held. Where “important people” decide “important things.” The decisions made at the table impact the lives and careers of many who are not involved in the conversations leading up to them. Too often, these decisions are made without providing a voice to entire groups of people. The table becomes an echo chamber of ideas and fails to consider the diverse needs of the people it impacts. So, how do we ensure diverse voices are heard? How do we get a seat at the table? And once there, how do we use our seats to serve more than just our own interests?

 

Historically, the tables where decisions are made have been treated as exclusive clubs with all the seats occupied by like-minded people from similar backgrounds. It is certainly intimidating to encounter a group of leaders and come to the realization that none of them look like you, none of them come from where you came from, and you cannot connect with them from a perspective of a shared experience. We may have much to offer, but self-doubt will sneak up on even the most confident person in the face of a group of decision makers who do not reflect them. In reality, we all thrive when there are people of all ages, genders, races, ethnicities, and socioeconomic backgrounds contributing to the decision-making process. This realization is spreading, and the value of diversity at the table is becoming clearer. However, the effort cannot be unilateral. It takes work from both those who wish to gain a seat at the table and those who need to make room for others to join.

 

It goes without saying that a seat must be earned. To occupy a position of influence, we absolutely must be willing to put in the work to learn the skills valued by our industry. We also must be willing to continue to learn from people of all experience levels around us. But hard work alone doesn’t guarantee that our voices will be heard, our opinions valued, and our hard-earned expertise requested. Diversity of opinions requires a representative diversity of people seated at the table. Breaking into a group of decision makers in our industry requires some showmanship—especially if we are trying to present a new idea or perspective. The initial reaction to change may be doubt, fear, and skepticism. If we want our voices to be heard, we should also be trustworthy and confident in our skills and expertise.

 

With a backdrop of expertise, we simply cannot be afraid to make our opinions known. Our perspectives and contributions may have significant value, and our participation can be a catalyst for an innovative solution. Valuable contribution alone should earn us a seat at the table. In our industry, knowing how to deliver a message is just as important as the message. We need to be able to communicate clearly and persuasively to convince others to not only take a moment to listen to our new perspectives, but also to trust that our ideas are worth trying. With confidence in our message, our expertise, and the value of our contribution, perhaps it is time to simply pull up a seat without an invitation. It may mean approaching the problem from a different angle, presenting our ideas in a different way, or it may just require leading by example and starting a new table. There may not be room for everyone at the table, but there is most definitely room for all perspectives, and we should feel confident that our ideals are represented.

 

With a seat at the table secured, what’s next? With “power” comes responsibility. Once we have earned a seat at the table with diverse and innovative ideas and perspectives, the drive to make a positive impact should not sputter when we finally acquire some influence. Most importantly, we must be willing to shatter the echo chamber and work to make room at the table for others who can help round out the conversation. Skill and influence are empty without the willingness to mentor newcomers and nurture innovation and diversity. Transparency surrounding our journey and our own hurdles can go a long way in encouraging others to bring their ideas to the table sparking progress, inclusivity, and the satisfaction of knowing we are each making an impact.

 

Diversity at the table is not just an initiative, it’s a resource that has not been fully tapped. There are countless voices that have not been given the platform to be heard, and they can make a major impact. If you are seated at the table, scoot over and make some room. If you haven’t been offered a seat yet, pull up a chair. Let’s talk.

 

Copyright @2022

USFN Report - Winter 2022

Tags:  #diversityandinclusion  ability  diversity  mentoring 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Battling Historical Exclusion and Social Constructs: Uncommon Roles for Women

Posted By USFN, Tuesday, October 19, 2021

by Janice Nakano
Aldridge Pite LLP
USFN Member (AK, CA, FL, GA, HI, ID, NY, OR, UT, WA)

Part one of a two-part series.


Most of us remember that scene in the movie My Cousin Vinnie, when Marisa Tomeis character is called to the stand as an expert witness. I knew what was coming but relished witnessing it happening before a court. She was about to put the prosecutor in his place, and I felt such pride watching her do just that. This woman, whose strong New Jersey accent and alluring attire and flirtatious attitude, is stereotypically the opposite of what some may perceive as a credible expert in the field of automotive mechanics. She proceeded to rattle off details that left the men in the room flabbergasted.

Women working as auto mechanics is not the norm. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, in 2018 there were 19,236 female auto mechanics (2.1 percent of all auto mechanics) and a total of 130,174 women in the field of automotive repair and maintenance. Why are women in this field underrepresented
? Perhaps one of the main reasons female auto mechanics are so rare is because of a lack of role models in the past. Do social constructs influence interests at an early age? We all know that men and women, for the most part, are wired differently, but that doesnt mean that we cant rewire and rewrite our future and we want to make room for the idea that the wiring is a result of expectations and attempts to “fit in.

Another field that is highly underrepresented, but slowly growing, is women in the military. In the true-life story of Megan Leavey, this young female Marine corporal served as a Military Police K9 handler. Leavey and her military working dog, Rex, served two deployments in Iraq and completed more than 100 missions, saving countless lives. At first, I wondered why a woman would want to work in one of the most dangerous jobs in the military: combat. She said that the main reason why she enlisted in the Marines was because of September 11
th. She completed her basic training at Parris Island and enrolled to become part of the military police, applying to the K-9 unit where she was assigned to Rex. In her second deployment to Ramadi in 2006, she and Rex were both injured by a makeshift explosive device. Upon her return, she received the Purple Heart and, although it took until 2012, with the help from a NY Senator, Rex was released and retired from military duty, and they were reunited.

This brave woman went into a battle zone where even some of the most courageous soldiers are afraid to go. So why arent there more women in the military? For starters, it has been an arduous struggle convincing the military that women can play an important role in combat, administration, and leadership. It wasn’t until January 2013 that the Combat Exclusion Policy was lifted, and women were finally eligible to serve in front line combat and complete combat operations. This prohibition had tremendous impact on the opportunities women had. Fortunately, society is slowly changing its expectations to a male-only view of type of soldiering views are changing and as more young women join up, we will see more women moving into roles that were once thought of as a mans job.

The third uncommon role for women is firefighting. The first woman firefighter is said to have been a woman named Molly Williams, who became a member of the New York City Oceanus Engine Company #11 in 1815. By the 1970s, women were becoming career firefighters, working side-by-side with their male peers.  The story of Cindy Fralick is depicted in the movie aptly named, Firefighter,” in which Ms. Fralick fights to become LA’s first female firefighter during the early 1980’s. Ms. Fralick passes the written exams, but many doubt she will be strong enough to pass the physical tests. After her training, she becomes the first woman in sixty years to pass the tests. She enters the Academy where she is treated atrociously and wants to give up, but she is encouraged by her Chief to continue her pursuit. Through hard work and perseverance, she earns the respect in her community and among her fellow firefighters. 

Generally, we view firefighting as a mans job. We think it takes power and stamina to work in this profession. Honestly, Im not sure how easily I would be able to carry a firehose up a flight of stairs, all while wearing a uniform that adds up to about 45 extra pounds. Add on a thermal imaging camera, radio, and set of irons and youre up to about 75 pounds. Theres no doubt that a certain amount of physical strength is necessary to do the job, but fitness and training can give women the tools they need to become a firefighter.  Today, more than 6,500 women now hold career firefighting and fire officers positions in the United States. Add on the volunteer and paid-on-call fire and EMS forces and there are perhaps 30-40,000 women firefighters in the U.S.

The common basis for the idea that an occupation is “a man’s job” are historical exclusion or social constructs. If we are thoughtful about how we view work and who may be doing the work, we can change those expectations. Overcoming barriers set to prevent access to advancement especially as imposed upon women is a pursuit that continues today, but as women become more involved in industries and organizations, we are seeing a cultural shift. I am encouraged by organizational involvement in making the right changes to create an environment where any minority can rise through the ranks and become the leaders of our future. 

Copyright © 2021 USFN. All rights reserved.

October 2021 e-Update

Tags:  ability  gender identity  sex 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Unconscious Bias: Checking Your Blindspot

Posted By USFN, Wednesday, July 21, 2021



by Marcy Ford
Trott Law, P.C.
USFN Member (MI, MN)

Unconscious biases, also known as implicit biases, are the underlying attitudes and stereotypes that people unconsciously attribute to another person or group of people that affect how they understand and engage with a person or group. Unconscious bias is different than structural or system racism, but it is just as damaging in discriminating against a person or group. It may be even more damaging when you consider that unconscious bias is hard to prove, difficult to measure, and many people are unwilling to acknowledge that they have a bias.

Just like a lawyer (that may be a bias!), I need to deliver a waiver clause. I am a white, middle-aged woman writing an article about a topic which is important to me, but one where I am absolutely part of the problem. I have biases, some that I acknowledge and am okay with, such as my bias in believing that Michigan Wolverine fans are far superior to Ohio State Fans.  I have some biases that I acknowledge, and I am working on, and some that I am not even aware of – at least until one of my children points out that I have put my foot in it. While later in my life than I would wish, I have been working for about two years with a small group to actively become aware of my biases, take ownership of them, and then work to change those that impact my work, my social network, my relationships, and all those that happen to be part of all of those groups. It is a work in progress that I expect will never end because these biases are ingrained, built over several generations, passed down like grandma’s pierogi recipe, and rarely acknowledged or discussed.

While unconscious bias in your personal life may lead to a less interesting existence, unconscious bias in the workplace robs worthy individuals of opportunity, decreases the diversity and richness of the work environment, and may result in decreased revenue where the marketplace demands not just equality, but equity in the ranks and in leadership.  If, as a business owner, I do not acknowledge and eliminate my unconscious bias there will be a direct impact on both hiring and retention. When looking for outstanding candidates to become associate attorneys and/or future partners and I look only to my former university, which is predominately white, get recommendations from my friends, who are predominately white, and advertise in a newspaper whose readership is mostly suburban, I have engaged in a form of unconscious bias known as affinity bias.

I make the presumption that because a candidate has similar background and experiences as me and knows people, I know that they will fit into the organizational culture and do a great job. By my unconscious biases I have eliminated other qualified candidates from even applying for this position - others that would add diversity, bring different ideas and experiences to the table, and be perhaps even better prepared for the difficult work we do.  The seemingly innocent decisions that were made on where to find candidates eliminated almost any opportunity to draw a diverse candidate pool, let alone hire someone who looks and thinks different than I do. Likewise, when looking at retention of a diverse workforce we must consider what factors we are utilizing for promotion and leadership opportunity. Are employees being mentored by individuals who value the skills and experience that the diverse employee/attorney brings to the firm? Have we allowed employees the ability to structure their schedule such that they can participate in special projects, social engagement opportunities, and networking? For example, parents, especially single parents, may not be able to participate in early morning or evening activities. If we schedule the majority of activities that foster leadership development during those times, we will have limited the growth and contribution of those employees and likely find that they will quickly be looking for another employer who will better foster their individual development.

There are many common conscious and unconscious biases in the workplace. Ageism, racism, gender bias, beauty bias, and name bias, are a few unconscious biases to be aware of and actively work to correct. In an interview, it would be prohibited for the interviewer to eliminate a prospect because the applicant is black or brown. But frequently a first or last name on a resume can at least suggest that the candidate is of a specific racial or ethnic group. Is that person less likely to even be granted an interview, thus eliminating opportunities for career advancement, economic security, and family stability?  The answer is yes. Some studies suggest that white names received 50% more callbacks for interviews than African American names and that Asian names were around 30% less likely to get a callback. 

Eliminating unconscious bias takes work. The first step is to acknowledge that we all have these biases.  Step two is to accept that the biases have a mostly negative impact on the person or group that is being assigned the stigma associated with the bias and therefore it is important to eliminate the unconscious biases.  Step three is to begin working towards the elimination of the bias. They cannot and should not be ignored. In the workplace examples above, the employer could activity solicit resumes from diverse colleges and universities, such as a historically black colleges and university, and not rely on referrals from personal relationships with people of similar characteristics.  Additionally, to eliminate name and personal identity bias applicant applications could be scrubbed of personal information through a numbering system or a third-party unbiased person.

Recognizing and eliminating implicit bias in the workplace is work, but it is necessary work.  To learn about some of your own biases I encourage you to take the Harvard Implicit Association Test (IAT) at implicit.harvard.edu.  It is possible you won’t like the outcome, but if we, both individually and as a society, do not recognize the damage of implicit bias and start with ourselves, we will never effectuate lasting change.

 

Copyright © 2021 USFN. All rights reserved.

 

Summer 2021 USFN Report

 

Tags:  ability  bias  hiring  HR 

PermalinkComments (0)
 
Membership Software Powered by YourMembership  ::  Legal