This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are used for visitor analysis, others are essential to making our site function properly and improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Click Accept to consent and dismiss this message or Deny to leave this website. Read our Privacy Statement for more.
Home   |   Contact Us   |   Sign In   |   Register
Article Library
Blog Home All Blogs

Error Does Not Compute: 7 Tips to Avoid Age Discrimination Toward Technically Challenged Employees

Posted By USFN, Friday, October 21, 2022

By Victor Kang, Esq.

Rubin Lublin,LLC*

USFN Member (AL, GA, MS, TN)

 

As we move into the post-COVID world where companies are battling staffing shortages and remote workforce demands, a new struggle for employers is how best to meet these challenges by leveraging technology. By now, everybody in the default services workforce has most likely used Zoom, Webex, Go-To-Connect, and probably has had nightmares with that incessant Teams notification rattling in your brain (bumm-bumm-bloop-bloop-dahbumm-bumm). No matter how the workforce is structured, there are elements of technology that intrude into all areas of work.

With that in mind, what do you do if you have employees who refuse to learn or adapt to this new era of communication? What are your options if an employee continues to ignore company policies that attempt to automate or create efficiencies through use of new advances? As an important, but often ignored, aspect of DEI, ageism is something that all employers must be careful to not perpetuate in their human resource decisions.  In 2020, more than 20,000 age discrimination complaints were filed with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The AARP says that almost two out of three workers who are 45-plus years old- have seen or experienced age discrimination in their workplace. In the same survey, 91% of those respondents said that age discrimination is common.

Inevitably, there will be situations where you may have to move forward and separate from an employee due to their inability to adapt. Here are some pointers on how to avoid potential discrimination lawsuits or challenges to your company’s policies.

1.      Document Everything!

Under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), workers ages 40 and over are protected from age discrimination in the workplace. This means that an employee cannot face harassment, discrimination, termination, or pressure to retire because of their age. This protection should be factored into all actions taken to remediate or correct an employee who is protected. Additionally, depending on your jurisdiction, terminated employees may ask for a reason or documentation. Even for states that are at-will employment, the terminated employee can (and often will) file a complaint with state or federal authorities (State Department of Labor or the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission). It is paramount that your managers document effectively that the employee was given proper trainings, re-trainings, and other remedial measures to give them every chance to learn the new skills.

2.      Provide Trainings and Skill Assessments

When you hold trainings on new technologies, do not exclude older workers. Make sure that trainings are crafted to all skill levels; do not assume that all staff have similar backgrounds.  Some may require more personalized trainings, and age should not factor into who gets more attention. Document each additional training and require acknowledgement from the staff; require read receipts or written signatures as part of your training. Prepare knowledge and skill tests that require a passing score. With more layers of training documentation and skill assessments, you can document that any potential remedial actions are justified and based solely on skill set and aptitude.

 

3.      Review Potential Accommodations Within Reason

If you come across situations where staff members cannot or will not learn the new skills, a potential alternative is to see if there are any other job functions that may require less technical skills. Perhaps there are roles that require more manual duties. This form of accommodation, especially for protected classes, can show that you exhausted all options. Be careful, however, not to allow certain people to be held to a different standard of duties. Even though staff under 40 may not be protected from age discrimination, you may unintentionally create a toxic work environment if any staff member is immune from client systems or online meetings. Ironically enough, the thought of not forcing an older worker to learn newer technology to prevent ageism claims might backfire and lead to MORE discrimination because of resentment from co-workers. You might start hearing derogatory nicknames because other staff members have to create workarounds for the employee. 

4.      Stay Consistent Among ALL Staff

When you are ready to move forward with a write-up, consult with your HR manager to create a clearly worded action plan. Make sure to list out all trainings, meetings, one-on-ones, and other proof that the employee was given the same (or additional) training. Including additional verbiage to clarify that these new tasks are a result of client/court requirements (i.e., using BKFS, Serengeti, e-File, PACER, Tempo, etc.) or essential communication tools for remote work will demonstrate that you are not arbitrarily creating processes to target the employee’s lack of skills. For example, if an employee is a fully remote worker, you have justification to require them to use Zoom, Teams, or other communication tools to facilitate contact with them. Requiring the use of other technology, like logging billable hours through web-based applications, using e-faxes, scanners, and webcams can all be an essential part of the job if the requirements are equally applied.

5.      Spread The Wealth

Termination is not the only time age discrimination can occur under ADEA. In considering promotions and compensation, age cannot be a factor in your analysis. One question all companies and firms may deal with is how to compensate or account for aging employees who may show decline in efficiency and productivity as they age. An employment attorney, in conjunction with your HR manager, should be able to help navigate this conundrum. But, as with all other areas, focus solely on the skill set and utility of the worker. Use measurable metrics (files touched, accuracy rates, internal performance scorecards) that cannot be attributed solely to age to avoid challenges of discriminatory promotions or raises.

6.      Hire Younger? Not So Fast!

Perhaps by only hiring younger applicants, you think you can avoid some of the issues touched on above? That’s definitely not the right way to proceed. Another area under the ADEA that can be a potential issue is discriminating applicants based on their age. Searching the internet for an applicant’s age or looking at the year a candidate received their degree on a resume, are major missteps and something that ADEA does not allow. The recommendation is to have blind resume reviews where school graduation dates are obscured. Also, to avoid age discrimination, create knowledge or skill-based tests that can be used to differentiate prospective candidates based solely on ability and not age. For example, use a combination of basic knowledge tests (math/grammar/attention to detail) and computer skills aptitude tests (create dummy files in your client system and give them simple instructions to locate a file by loan number, typing speed tests, internet- and MS Office-skills tests). Most recruiting sites like Indeed, ZipRecruiter, SimplyHired and Monster will have examples of skill tests.

7.      Don’t Underestimate An Ageism Claim

While ageism claims are viewed as sometimes harder to successfully prove compared to other discrimination suits, bear in mind that a plaintiff who successfully sues an employer for age discrimination under the ADEA can potentially recover back pay, lost benefits, and equitable relief including front pay, along with attorney’s fees and damages. Front pay covers the loss of income that may continue to occur after the trial is over. Some examples of damages paid include $15.4 million from the LA Times to a sportswriter and $11 million from Google to over 200 plaintiffs. These damages can cripple a company, so the risk is extremely high and worth avoiding at all costs. The root of most of these cases originated from mass layoffs. Unfortunately, during the COVID pandemic, almost every firm and company was affected by the moratoria against foreclosure and eviction actions.  Hopefully, we never experience that again, but if you find yourself having to undertake layoffs, make absolutely certain that age is not a factor. You must not consider how soon they may be near retirement age; while it may seem logical to force someone out with an early retirement, an involuntary termination can lead to potential claims.

Companies ultimately want to avoid all forms of discrimination. In addition to the federal protections offered under the ADEA, consult with an employment attorney to make sure any actions you undertake do not run afoul of any state or local guidelines. Some jurisdictions may have additional constraints on top of state or Federal guidelines. Ageism and technology, unfortunately, are linked at the hip, so take the time to foster a collaborative environment for all backgrounds. Steer clear of stereotypes and have a diverse workforce. Consult your HR manager and employment attorney when implementing new policies that could be viewed as targeting those over 40. In the end, just like with any other protected class, equal treatment of all is the basic tenet to avoid issues.

 

Copyright @2022

Fall 2022 USFN Report

Tags:  #ageism  #Equity. #Inclusion  age discrimination  Diversity 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Moving the Diversity Goal Line for Minority and Women Owned Business Standards

Posted By USFN, Monday, August 15, 2022

By Brian Vaughn

McCalla RaymerLeibert Pierce, LLC*

USFN Member (AL, CA, CT, FL, GA, IL, KY, MS, NV, NJ, NY, OH, OR, TX WA)

 

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) is top of mind for most people these days.  We see and hear about the importance of DEI in the news, social media, and at conferences. Starting a meaningful conversation about DEI for many companies may seem daunting or the timing may seem like climbing a mountain during the greatest pandemic in our lifetimes. Honestly, the time is past due and the pandemic, in a way, has offered us an opportunity as many companies are having to rebuild their teams.

 

A tougher question may be: Are our current standards on Minority and Women Owned Business (MWOB) outdated?  Are we acknowledging those that have moved past the standard goal of what was originally intended with MWOB?  We push our companies to a broader image of what diversity is from an overall staffing level; should we be doing the same for our companies’ ownership? We could start by increasing each type of minority owner, rather than trying to achieve the goal of fitting into the small box by simply achieving a particular status of women-owned, or veteran-owned, or African American-owned business, for example, as set forth by the government. While there are certifications that seek to allow for an expanded definition of “minority-owned” to be more inclusive, rather than exclusive (for example, Chicago’s Minority and Women-Owned Business Certification Program, which certifies firms who have 51% ownership by a minority OR a woman), the federal classifications do require your firm to fit into one specific area to obtain certification.

 

DEI has evolved to expand inclusion and suggested staffing models that reflect our society.  We strive to create an encompassing group of people to bring in all visions and ideals to better our organizations.  We look to have a well-rounded team from a spectrum of all genders, races, ethnicities, ages, religions, disabilities, and sexual orientations; yet when it comes to our ownership, we only recognize those that are owned by at least 51% of one diverse group.  Is it time for our acknowledgement of ownership that surpasses the standard model to be our new goal?

 

Let’s review a couple of examples. An organization’s ownership is made up of 40% women, 15% minority, 25% LGBTQ and 20% other non-women or non-minority. This makeup is 75% diverse, yet according to our current standards, we do not acknowledge this organization for reaching what we hope our DEI goals aim to achieve.  Another organization’s ownership is split evenly by four owners into 25% portions.  The diversity makeup of the ownership is African American, Latinx, Women and LGBTQ, making this 100% diverse ownership.  For these suggested organizations to meet the 51% current standards, the ownership would have to reduce its diversity to only allow one diverse segment the majority ownership.  So, in effect, this dilutes their ownership’s diversity, moving us away from a true goal of any DEI ownership program.

 

While many still fall short of the basic 51% standard, is it time to expand our understanding of diversity in ownership to better match our overall DEI goals?   For decades, since its inception, the 51% rule has been the line in the sand for DEI ownership, but government and corporations are looking to suppliers that more closely match their overall diversity goals.

 

Expanding the standards to include organizations with ownership that meet a higher level of combined women and minority threshold is key to moving all DEI initiatives forward. This doesn’t mean removing the current standard of 51%, but rather adding expanded options for firms that meet a 70% or higher combined women and minority ownership.

 

Copyright @2022

USFN August e-Update

Tags:  #Diversity  #Equity  #Equity. #Inclusion  #USFN 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Diversity, Equity & Inclusion: Q&A with Janice Nakano

Posted By USFN, Tuesday, June 14, 2022

USFN’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Section periodically spotlights professionals promoting DEI and enacting education initiatives within the industry. Janice Nakano, Director of Client Relations and Business Development for Aldridge Pite, LLP, describes how she champions diversity and draws from her personal experiences to better understand and learn from others. Learn more about Janice and her efforts and discover small ways you can support DEI in your own work/life.

 

 

How would you describe your current thinking about diversity, and how has your thinking changed over time?

As an older adult, I’m more educated about what diversity means and how differences can and should be used to create a rounded perspective and understanding of different people, cultures, and identities. Traveling to foreign countries has certainly opened my mind to the fact that even though we may be from different backgrounds and cultures, we are all striving to have the basics: a roof over our head, a job, a family, friends, and a social existence. Before my foreign travels, I was definitely more self-centric (aren’t we all when we’re teenagers and in our 20s)?

 

Can you share some examples of how you championed diversity?

Participation: I have always been supportive of diverse communities. Since the late 1970’s, I have supported the LGBTQIA+ community in any way that I can by participating in parades, charities, galas, and events. I have to thank my two best friends growing up for enabling me to be a part of this community.

 

Support: Supporting women is also something I’ve felt a natural affinity with. I have mentored several young women who have grown into incredible professionals in their careers and continue to do so. I’ve worked with organizations that help women in various manners. Dress for Success is one of those organizations that give women the power to achieve economic independence by giving them tools, aka business outfits and self-care packages. The Mom Project and Path Forward are two organizations that I am just becoming familiar with. These companies help women who want to return to the workforce by equipping them with the tools they need, job prospects, and a community to support them.

 

Education: Currently, I’m educating myself in racial equality and the history of racism. Two books that stand out are, “How to Be an Antiracist” by Ibram X. Kendi, and “The 1921 Tulsa Race Massacre: A Photographic History” by Karlos K. Hill.

 

How would you serve diverse groups or traditionally underserved communities?

I live in New York City, which is filled with cultural, racial, socio-economic, and religious diversity to say the least. I try to buy groceries, clothing, and other necessities from my local shops or go to specific neighborhoods where I can find ethnic items.

 

What challenges do you think you will face working with a diverse population?

I like to think that I can communicate with any community. Language can be a challenge, but having lived in France before I could speak the language has taught me patience and understanding when communicating with a non-English speaker, or someone with very little English or a strong accent.

 

Growing up in a Buddhist household, when all my friends came from other different religious backgrounds, helped me to understand that we may have different faiths, but on a fundamental level, we are all taught to be kind, love thy neighbor, and be honest and caring.

 

Describe your ideal corporate approach to diversity, equity, and inclusion. What obstacles do you see in implementing the ideal approach?

Firstly, create a group or committee, state the group’s mission, create goals, and implement a path to achieving goals. Obstacles: making sure this does not become a group that is used to solely voice complaints.

 

How do you measure success in diversity, equity, and inclusion?

In business, through reporting and analytics, we can look at performance, pay equity, talent recruitment, and retention. Focus on measuring influence and power (people), rather than representation (numbers).

 

What positive outcomes do you think you will encounter by working with a diverse population?

Different perspectives offer a well-rounded understanding of a situation/topic/task. Learning about other cultures helps me to understand about others’ choices and decisions.

 

How would you advocate for diversity education and diversity initiatives with individuals who don’t see its value?

The best way to convince others to see the value in DEI, is to educate through discussions, suggested readings, providing information on events, and how to participate in DEI activities.

 

How would you handle a situation in which someone made a sexist, racist, homophobic, or otherwise prejudiced remark in a professional setting? In a social setting?

In both professional and social settings, I would let people know immediately that the behavior/comment is not acceptable. I have absolutely no problem confronting the person in a respectful and non-aggressive way.

 

How has your education/work experience prepared you for working with a diverse population?

As a chef in California, many of my co-workers were Mexican. In Europe, many of the support kitchen staff were from Africa. In both cases, these groups were, at the time, considered sub-standard groups.

 

Being a part of a DEI group has definitely expanded my knowledge and given me more tools for working and living with a diverse population.

 

Has your background prepared you to be effective in an environment that values diversity?

Growing up in a traditionally Japanese American household, but in a predominantly Caucasian

neighborhood, I always thought of myself as different. My family was the only Japanese family in our neighborhood and there was only one other Asian student with me kindergarten through sixth grade. My appearance has always been mistaken for either Latin American, an Islander, or Caucasian. I’m certain the inability for people to put me into a specific category enabled me to be part of every category in a sense, but at the same time, I wanted to be like “all the other girls” and identify as Caucasian. As I’ve grown older, I’ve embraced my diversity even more. Living in New York City has also allowed me to be part of and value the many cultures that exist.

 

 

Are you actively engaged in a group or organization that promotes diversity?

Yes, I am Vice Chair on the Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Committee with USFN.

 

What is the most challenging situation dealing with diversity that you have faced and how did you handle it?

I remember one time when a teenage girl was slinging offensive comments to a much older man, complaining how long it took for him to unload his groceries from a shopping cart. I turned to this girl and told her that she should have more respect for the elderly, and how would she feel if someone spoke to her grandparents like that. Her response was “whatever.” I honestly don’t think she got it. I’m a firm believer that karma will handle people and their actions.

 

Have you ever realized that you said or did something that may have been offensive to a colleague/co-worker/friend? How did you respond to that realization, and what was the outcome?

I remember telling a joke once to a friend, only to realize later just how offensive it was. My friend didn’t say anything at the time, but later, I did bring it up and apologized for being so disrespectful and insensitive. As I’ve grown older, I realize the impact words have and how important it is to think about what you say and how you say it.

 

How would you ensure that you are inclusive of everyone’s viewpoints and what is your approach to understanding different cultural viewpoints?

I believe asking questions is a big part of communication and learning. I’m interested in hearing about what other people think, even when they have very different viewpoints and perspectives than I do.

 

How do you go about ensuring that you are removing bias from your day-to-day work/life?

I am a work in progress. Confirmation bias is something I am trying to change in myself by reading and listening to different opinions and points of views. I still find myself using gender-specific language such as ‘guys,’ ‘dudes,’ “hey man,’ and similar terms when speaking with other women, or a group that includes women. I’m working on being consciously aware of what I’m saying and who I’m saying it to.

 

@Copyright 2022

June 2022 USFN e-Update

 

Tags:  #Diversity  #Equity. #Inclusion  #Q&A  #USFN 

PermalinkComments (0)
 
Membership Software Powered by YourMembership  ::  Legal