by Brian Liebo, Esq. and Paul
Weingarden, Esq.
Usset, Weingarden & Liebo, PLLP
USFN Member (MN)
Five Week Redemption Period for
Abandoned Properties
It’s that time of year, yet again - wintertime
in Minnesota. Twenty below zero with another six-month period of time
when pipes can freeze and burst causing damage to the property. Your local
property preservation team has just called you (hopefully long-distance for
your sake) suggesting one of your mortgaged properties is vacant.
So now what’s a Lender to do? You’re in luck. Under Minnesota
Statutes § 582.031, if a mortgaged property is vacant, the mortgage holder can
take the necessary steps to protect its security without becoming what is
termed a “mortgagee in possession”. These
powers include authority to enter the property without a court order, secure
the property, winterize the property, inspect the premises and take all other
reasonable actions to prevent trespass, waste and damage to the premises.
The cost of such actions may be added to the principal balance of the mortgage,
or added to the redemption price if incurred after the foreclosure sale and an
affidavit of those posts-sale post-sale costs is timely provided to the
sheriff’s office.
Keep in mind, however, that this
statute also provides that, upon request, the servicer must deliver a key
(rather than simply access) to the borrower or any person lawfully claiming
through the borrower, which may include the owner, agent, tenant, or in the
case of death, the heirs or personal representatives. These requests should be
promptly honored, and we suggest your property preservation team be available
to respond to such requests on short notice.
So now that you have secured and
winterized the property, what’s next? Minnesota
law specifically contains a provision to shorten the foreclosure’s redemption
period to just five weeks (down from the standard six-month redemption period
or even the -month redemption period applicable to certain properties), thereby
cutting delay costs considerably. These
properties must be both vacant and abandoned, rather than just vacant. For example, if the vacant property is listed
for sale, then the property is almost certainly not abandoned.
The mechanics of this process are
found in Minnesota States § 582.032 which dovetails nicely with the securing
powers available to lenders in § 582.031 for vacant properties. In most
cases, a mortgage servicer changing the locks and terminating a utility commences
a showing of proof of abandonment. Once secured, an affidavit by the
servicer asserting no person with a right of possession to the property has
requested a key within 10 days of securing constitutes a prima facie establishment of abandonment. Procedurally, there
is an abbreviated court action required to request a judicial determination of
abandonment and reduction in the redemption period to five weeks. If there
is no opposing appearance at the hearing following proper service, such absence
constitutes conclusive evidence of abandonment and the Order will issue.
This redemption shortening process is
only applicable to properties that are 10 acres or less, improved with a
residential dwelling of four or less units, are not model homes or dwellings
under construction, and are not used in agricultural production. Also keep in mind that while an encumbering
federal income tax lien may not prevent the shortening of the redemption period
for the borrower, it may preclude reducing the redemption period for the
federal interests under 120 days.
Five
Week Redemption Period for Borrower-Initiated Postponements
In contrast, there is another five-week
redemption period at play in Minnesota, which is Minnesota Statutes § 580.07, Subd.
2. While this statute does not actually shorten the timing of the overall
foreclosure process (and instead actually adds one week to the overall
process), it can be a formidable tool for borrowers working with servicers to
extend the time before the foreclosure sale occurs to have more loss mitigation
options available.
In short, the borrower can unilaterally
use a specific affidavit to delay the sheriff’s sale date by five months (for a
six-month redemption period foreclosure) or 11 months (for a 12-month period
foreclosure). The borrower’s affidavit
must be recorded and served on both the sheriff and foreclosing party’s counsel
at least 15 days before the scheduled foreclosure sale. In exchange, the borrower’s redemption period
is automatically reduced to just five weeks.
This right to postpone unilaterally by the borrower can only be
exercised once, regardless of whether the borrower reinstates the mortgage
before the postponed foreclosure sale. If
the initial foreclosure is ultimately stopped by the mortgage servicer, rather
than by the borrower reinstating or filing bankruptcy, it is common practice in
Minnesota to accept the borrower’s subsequent postponement election. Otherwise, mortgage servicers could simply
stop and restart foreclosures as soon as a borrower’s postponement affidavit is
received to avoid the statute’s intended effects.
This postponement process has the
particular advantage of preserving available loss mitigation options for the
lender and borrower. Since the pre-sale foreclosure
period is extended with this postponement procedure, the borrower and lender
have more extensive loss mitigation tools available. The borrower can still modify the mortgage,
work out a forbearance, enter a repayment plan, or utilize any other loss
mitigation options available. Once the
sheriff’s sale occurs though, the available loss mitigation options are
typically just a short sale or short redemption.
The primary concern a lender may have
is that the extension of the pre-sale foreclosure period also gives the
borrower more time to file for bankruptcy relief enabling an endless loop of
postponements and bankruptcy filings. That
assumption is somewhat correct, since bankruptcy filings after borrower
postponements are a common practice.
However, the drafters of § 580.07 wisely anticipated this, and added a
provision that if a borrower obtains a bankruptcy stay after electing
postponement of the sheriff’s sale under the statute, then when the stay is no
longer applicable, the five-week redemption period remains applicable to the
foreclosure process.
Also keep in mind that a
borrower-initiated postponement extends the time for dual-tracking protections
for the borrower. In Minnesota a
qualifying borrower has the right to apply for loss mitigation up to seven business
days before the original sheriff’s sale date or the new sale date resulting
from the borrower’s postponement, whichever is later, to activate related
dual-tracking protections.
As practice tips for mortgage
servicers, these Minnesota statutes involving five-week redemption periods can
be effective tools for avoiding potential losses or delay costs. The first statutes mentioned (Sections 582.
031 and 582.032) are powerful tools for protecting abandoned properties and
vastly shortening the redemption periods surrounding qualifying properties.
On the other hand, the latter statute
mentioned (Section 580.07, Subd. 2) is a great tool for borrowers and mortgage
servicers looking for more time to work with a wider variety of loss mitigation
options available before the sheriff’s sale than the more limited options after
the sheriff’s sale occurs. This benefit
of having greater flexibility in loss mitigation options comes at the
relatively small price of having the overall foreclosure process extended by
just one week.
Copyright © 2021 USFN. All rights reserved.
February 2021 e-Update